Thank you for inviting me to attend this meeting, so that I have the opportunity to speak my opinion.

I was very confused when I got this topic, and I didn’t understand the thinking process of the lecture itself or the whole China’s evolution. Talk about it myself, I am not very embarrassed; the whole performance is complicated and multi-faceted, and it is too complicated. I want to go there, but I still use my age to explain it with concepts for these 40 years. Combined with the new trends over the past few years, our country’s leaders began to advocate tradition, so I followed this topic: “Returning from Yugos to Yidao”.

I divided the Chinese historical plan from 1840 into three levels of stability, and praised him. part. The first stage, the 80-year stage, 1840-1919, was the period of the advancement of Eastern civilization; the second stage, the 60-year stage, 1919-1978, was the period of the advancement of Su Russian civilization; the third stage, which has been 40 years so far, 1978 – Now, it is a period of traditional return to the outside world.

The first two stages, in 140 years, were the advancement of foreign civilizations, and the concept was the logical; in these 40 years, returning to the tradition of foreign countries, namely Yidao. After these 40 years, it was the Cultural Revolution, which was regarded as a hit by the foreign civilization; now it has turned back to the path of the previous kings, and has become more and more certain and more self-conscious in the path of the previous kings. So I’ve beaten this question.

This will first talk about the concept of the connotation of the Cultural Revolution. I just said that the concept of the Cultural Revolution was an external civilization. This is very different from what most current major students understand. Most people think that the Cultural Revolution is a traditional revival. My opinion is completely opposite.

According to the above three-stage plots of 80, 60 and 40 years, the Cultural Revolution, located at the end of the second stage of about 60 years, was the last attack of Su Russian civilization, or Lesseism, in China. After 40 years of discussion, we have to make a conceptual discussion on the reaction of civilization. The Cultural Revolution was a disaster that brought great pain to the Chinese people. In this emotional infection, I had complete differences with others and had no disagreements. The current problem is to propose a concept, that is, to make a judgment on the civilized meaning or civilized meaning of the Cultural Revolution.

Some people will say that the reaction of civilization is to destroy civilization, so there is no civilized meaning! Indeed, many cultural relics were destroyed during the Cultural Revolution. However, what drives people to act is thinking, so we have to ask: What kind of thinking is it? The civilized meaning I mean the thinking that arranges people’s actions, which can be formulated as conceptual thinking. A historical event that lasted for more than ten years could not have no civilized meaning, and perhaps the existence of a certain civilization could be identified.

All those who have lived through the Cultural Revolution know that the common people have expressed strong and durable religious enthusiasm. Many destruction of cultural relics are the result of this kind of religious pride. This kind of pride does not belong to Chinese tradition, but to foreign civilizations. In 2014, I proposed the “Three Civilizations Discussion” and regarded contemporary Chinese civilization as the two mainstreams in modern times. One is the Eastern Christian civilization, and the other is the Su Russian civilization, which has evolved into the foreign country tradition as a tributary and integrated it. Consider contemporary Chinese civilization as the integration of three streams. My statement was inspired by the theory of the origin of civilization by the teacher, the teacher of Ton, but changed the civilization to be replenished for a month to civilization, and only talk about the flow and not the source. It is called “civilized stems and branches”.

Of course, foreign civilizations as tributaries are also gradually formed in history. We need to sort out and understand nowIt cannot be said in detail, but it is just that when the two foreign civilizations advanced in modern times, they have evolved into such a tributary formed over the past five thousand years. To the point that people have a common understanding: the tributaries of the outer country have a very stable tradition. I mark this tradition with Yidao.

Baoqiang.com rating

People today do not accept my views and believe that there is no need to plan a Su Russian civilization from the Eastern civilization. In this way, according to the “History Research” by Tonbi, the five civilizations that exist in the world in the contemporary world are listed, and the Eastern Orthodox civilization and the Eastern Christian civilization are clearly ranked. Su Russia belongs to Eastern Orthodox civilization.

Come out and get stuck here. Some people say that Leszianism is against Eastern Orthodox Church. How could Su Russia belong to Eastern Orthodox civilization? This is the difference between civilization and civilization in concept. (For example, religion, philosophy, and political management, it can be regarded as civilization within the civilization. The battle between Su Wei’s political power and the Eastern Orthodox Church is regarded as a matter within the Eastern Orthodox civilization.) Some people also say that Su League has also done a lot of efforts to become Eastern civilization, such as vigorously promoting industrialization, which should be considered as Eastern civilization.

I think this is not enough. In terms of scientific and technical aspects, our country can be said to be fully integrated, but in terms of social fields and civilization, it cannot be transformed from the east.

The second is to look at our own personal and personal experience. The Chinese Yuan Dynasty adopted the Jerusalem Yuan, which should have come from Su Russia. The new country is a big deal. The Chinese government is a traditional innovation. There is no ceremony for worshiping the heavens in China. It is believed that power is a civil servant, not a human servant, so it is a national name. The country means that power is granted to the public. With the national dollar, half of Chinese tradition is preserved.

The Yuan of the People’s Republic of China did not have any examples that followed the country, called “the first year of the People’s Republic of China”, but used the Yayuan, and avoided the name of Jesus and changed it to “April”. I think the People’s Republic of China’s Jesus Origin did not originate from Eastern Christian civilization, but from Su’s connection, which was the influence of Su Russian civilization.

What I guessed is that the national name of the test tree in Yunnan was the Chinese Republic of Viei. It is clear that Su Lian is undoubtedly aware of it. Of course, the final confirmation must be based on historical test certificates, such as how the Yuan Dynasty’s current political alliance was discussed that year. The centralism implemented in the Party also imitated Su Russia; the republic system of the Communist Party (Poland) was influenced by the Eastern Orthodox Church and was transformed creatively.

The heavy weight of the ordering time of our businessThinking about it comes from Su Russia. Leszism is based on the duality of intangible-in